Law firms
Specialist support in legal DD, technology transactions, IT/AI agreements and IP-, data- and vendor-related issues. Findings are translated into usable questions for warranties, terms, disclosures, risk allocation and deeper review.
Different decision contexts
Different decision contexts require different types of decision material. For law firms, the value may lie in translating technology risk into due diligence questions and contractual terms. For investors, it is often about value assumptions and transferability. For companies buying technology, it is about vendor risk, control and exit.
Regardless of context, the review is carried out according to a structured method and with a high level of care.
PE, VC and industrial buyers
Review of whether the technology’s value assumptions hold before investment, acquisition or strategic partnership, including technical substance, rights, dependencies, transferability and risk acceptance.
Companies buying technology
Vendor review before SaaS, AI or technology procurement, with focus on control, data, security, exit, contractual risk and how the dependency can be governed after the decision.
Management and boards
Decision material before AI adoption, major technology dependencies, outsourcing, platform change or sensitive regulatory decisions where responsibility and uncertainty need to be documented.
Early-stage investors
Red flag review of technology claims, AI elements, open source, IP control, vendor dependencies and documentation maturity before more capital or a deeper review is committed to the process.
Dispute, incident or vendor conflict
Structured review of what has actually been delivered, documented, controlled or promised when technology, data, AI or vendor dependencies are central to the conflict.